healthystealthy health hacks

 

Dietary fats and lower immunity link

10-Dec-2009

Fatty food rather than obesity in itself affected the ability of animals in a study to fight off sepsis caused by bacteria, claims a doctoral thesis from Sweden.

Results from a thesis from the Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg indicate that S. aureus-induced mortality is associated with dietary fat consisting of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids, but not polyunsaturated fatty acids.

Doctoral student Louise Strandberg, in her thesis, also investigated different variants of three genes that are important for the immune system and noted that several of the gene variants that strengthen immunity also result in less obesity.

Method

Strandberg said that S. aureus-induced mortality was investigated in mice fed a lard-based high fat diet (HFD), a diet rich in saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids (HFD/S) or a low fat diet (LFD).

She explained that after eight weeks on these diets, the mice were intravenously inoculated with S. aureus.

She said that a fourth group was added that included mice fed a HFD rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (HFD/P) from fish.

Results

According to Strandberg her results showed that the obese HFD/S-fed mice had increased S. aureus induced mortality compared with the lean LFD-fed mice. The HFD/S-fed mice showed signs of immune suppression as evident by increased bacterial load and decreased capacity to phagocytose bacteria.

Furthermore, she found that the HFD/P-fed mice displayed a degree of obesity and glucose intolerance that was milder than in the HFD/S-fed mice, but higher than in LFD mice.

But, she added, the S. aureus induced mortality and the bacterial load of HFD/P-fed mice were comparable with that of LFD-fed mice, and markedly lower than that of mice fed HFD/S.

"Obesity is usually associated with inflammation that does not result from an infection, which simply means that the immune defences are activated unnecessarily," said Strandberg. "Ironically, the mice on the high-fat diet (HFD/S) seem to have a less active immune system when they really need it."

The doctoral student concluded that the white blood cells of the mice on the HFD/S diet got worse at dealing with bacteria in the blood, which, she claims, could have contributed to many of them dying of sepsis.


http://www.foodnavigator-usa.com/Publications/Food-Beverage-Nutrition/NutraIngredients.com/Research/Study-shows-link-to-dietary-fats-and-lower-immunity/?c=0dQornGJR3r3%2BMgYtMN7Qw%3D%3D&utm_source=newsletter_daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2BDaily

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

Soy waste compound, Lunasin guards against inflammation by reducing pro-inflammatory Interleukin-6

By Stephen Daniells, 08-Dec-2009

Related topics: Research, Soy-based ingredients, Cancer risk reduction, Cardiovascular health, Diabetes

A compound often discarded as waste in soy-processing plants may stop inflammation, and protect against chronic diseases like diabetes and heart disease, says new research.

A soy protein called lunasin was found to significantly reduce levels of the pro-inflammatory compound interleukin-6, according to results from the University of Illinois.

If the study can be repeated in humans it offers promise for preventing chronic inflammation, brought about by an over-expression or lack of control of the normal protective mechanism. Chronic inflammation has been linked to range of conditions linked to heart disease, osteoporosis, cognitive decline and Alzheimer's, type-2 diabetes, and arthritis.

The researchers, led by Professor Elvira de Mejia, have published a raft of papers supporting the benefits of the compound. A study published this year in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry supported the bioavailability of lunasin.

The bioavailability looked at the effect of consuming 50 grams of soy protein as part of a soy milk shake and a serving of soy chili for five days. “Significant levels of the peptide in the participants' blood give us confidence that lunasin-rich soy foods can be important in providing these health benefits,” said Elvira de Mejia.

The researchers followed this up with a study in Food Chemistry that reported the anti-inflammatory effects of lunasin for the first time. “We can see that daily consumption of lunasin-rich soy protein may help to reduce chronic inflammation. Future studies should help us to make dietary recommendations,” added de Mejia.

“We know that chronic inflammation is associated with an increased risk of malignancies, that it's a critical factor in tumor progression,” she added.

A third paper has just been published in Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, which reports that lunasin contains a specific sequence of amino acids - arginine, glycine, and aspartic acid – known as the RGD motif, which is known to offer cancer protective effects.

“Other scientists have noted the cancer-preventive effects of the RGD sequence of amino acids so it's important to find proteins that have this sequence,” said de Mejia.

Obtaining lunasin

While the results appear very promising for the development of a nutraceutical or lunasin-rich dietary supplement, the researchers note that it is relatively expensive to obtain lunasin from soy waste. On the flip side, soy flour does contain high concentrations of the peptide, said de Mejia.

According to the soybean germplasm collection maintained by the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and housed at the University of Illinoi, some genotypes contain very high concentrations of lunasin, obviously making these of more interest for the development of lunasin-rich soy foods.

Sources:
1. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Volume 57, Issue 4, Pages 1260-1266
“Presence of Lunasin in Plasma of Men after Soy Protein Consumption”
Authors: V.P. Dia, S. Torres, B.O. De Lumen, J.W. Erdman, Jr., E.G. De Mejia

2. Food Chemistry
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages 108-115
“Isolation, purification and characterisation of lunasin from defatted soybean flour and in vitro evaluation of its anti-inflammatory activity”
Authors: V.P. Dia, W. Wang, V.L. Oh, B.O.de Lumen, E. Gonzalez de Mejia

3. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research
Published online ahead of print, doi: 10.1002/mnfr.200900073
“Lunasin, with an arginine-glycine-aspartic acid motif, causes apoptosis to L1210 leukemia cells by activation of caspase-3”
Authors: E.G. de Mejia, W. Wang, V.P. Dia

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

Breast regrowth procedure trialled for mastectomy patients. Human trials to begin of surgical treatment that could allow women to regrow their breasts after a mastectomy

Mammogram scans for breast cancer

Mammogram scans for breast cancer. Photograph: Lester Lefkowitz/Getty

Scientists have developed a revolutionary surgical treatment that could allow women with cancer to regrow their breasts after a mastectomy.

Human trials for the procedure, which scientists hope could replace breast reconstructions and implants, will start within three to six months, it was revealed in Melbourne, Australia. It is likely to be three years before the technique is fully developed, researchers said.

The procedure involves inserting a biodegradable chamber into the woman's chest, contoured to match her natural breast shape and containing stem cells from her own fat tissue. These cells will divide and grow to recreate the permanent fat found in breasts.

Phillip Marzella, of the Bernard O'Brien Institute of Microsurgery, said in an interview with ABC radio: "We are starting what is called a prototype trial in the next three to six months – a proof of principle trial with about five to six women just to demonstrate that the body can regrow its own fat supply in the breast. Rather than have silicone implant or more complex surgery, we implant them with a device that we've developed."

The first trials would involve a non-biodegradable chamber, Marzella said. "What we are hoping to do in the next two years is develop a biodegradable chamber so that the fat can grow inside the chamber and then the chamber will vanish naturally."

Two approaches were involved, he said. "One is actually that nature abhors a vacuum so the chamber itself, because it is empty, it tends to be filled in by the body on itself. The second approach we have also developed is a gel-like substance that we can inject inside the chamber and that can also stimulate that growth.

"We will know within three to four months that you are actually getting fat and we are hoping to get a fully formed fat within six to eight months."

Preclinical tests in animals encouraged the researchers to be confident about starting human trials. Similar techniques had been tried for the bladder, but this was the first time a procedure had been developed for the breast, Marzella said.

"We are hoping to move on to other organs using the same principle – a chamber that protects and contains cells as they grow and they restore their normal function. So it is a pretty major leap for regenerative surgery and medicine."

Marzella said the procedure could replace breast reconstructions and implants within three years if it worked.

"We are hoping to be with a biodegradable prototype within 24 months, so at the end of these three years we will have to have another half a dozen patients. Certainly [it] doesn't relieve [patients] of the trauma of the cancer but it could be offering patients an alternative and some sort of relief from the diagnosis of breast cancer to know that they can regrow the breast."

He said the procedure had potential for cosmetic surgery, although he did not see it being used for such purposes in the near future.

"Certainly the same principle can be used for defects, so people that might have lost a piece of a face or the end of the nose, we are thinking we can use the same technology using a biodegradable scaffold that can then be filled with the patient's own tissue and cells," he said.

"In terms of the cosmetic use, we probably don't envisage this in the next five to 10 years, so I think in the first instance [it is] very much reconstructive therapies that would benefit from it."


http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/nov/12/mastectomy-regrow-breasts-trial

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

Does global warming make my ass look fat? Americans waste 1400 calories per person (enough to feed another whole person). It's negatively impacting the environment.

By Caroline Scott-Thomas, 27-Nov-2009

Americans waste about 1,400 calories-worth of food per person a day – or 40 percent of total food supply – with implications for climate change and obesity, claim US researchers.

The researchers, from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases in Maryland, found that food waste has increased 50 percent since 1974, reaching about 150 trillion calories per year in 2003. This takes into account wastage right along the food supply chain, including waste from farms, manufacturers, retailers and consumers.

The researchers, writing in the online journal Public Library of Science ONE, claim that the impact of food waste on the environment has been largely – and surprisingly – overlooked in discussions of climate change mitigation.

“Food waste contributes to excess consumption of freshwater and fossil fuels which, along with methane and CO2 emissions from decomposing food, impacts global climate change,” they wrote.

The study estimates that food waste accounts for 25 percent of fresh water use in the United States, and 300 million barrels of oil – about four percent of the country’s total oil consumption.

Cheap food and obesity

In addition, the authors argue that the increase in food waste indicates an excessive quantity of cheap food, which could help to explain why the prevalence of obesity has increased so rapidly – from 15 percent in 1980 to 34.3 percent, with another 32.7 percent overweight, according to the US Department of Health and Human Services.

“The calculated progressive increase of food waste suggests that the US obesity epidemic has been the result of a ‘push effect’ of increased food availability and marketing with Americans being unable to match their food intake with the increased supply of cheap, readily available food,” the authors wrote. “Thus, addressing the oversupply of food energy in the US may help curb the obesity epidemic as well as decrease food waste, which has profound environmental consequences.”

The researchers also suggested that if America’s food waste problem were tackled, it could help ease global problems of food shortages and food price spikes.

They estimated the quantity of food waste by developing a mathematical model to calculate American food consumption based on body weight and metabolism, and comparing the results with information about the US food supply. On this basis, they claim that previous calculations may have underestimated American food wastage by up to 25 percent.

The full study can be accessed online here .

Source: PLoS ONE

4(11): e7940. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007940 (2009)

“The Progressive Increase of Food Waste in America and Its Environmental Impact”


http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Publications/Food-Beverage-Nutrition/FoodNavigator-USA.com/Science-Nutrition/US-food-waste-impacts-climate-say-scientists/?c=0dQornGJR3qMPucd9RA1AQ%3D%3D&utm_source=newsletter_daily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2BDaily

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

Steve Jobs on being motivated by death

Steve Jobs, 2005 Stanford Commencement Address

Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life. Because almost everything — all external expectations, all pride, all fear of embarrassment or failure – these things just fall away in the face of death, leaving only what is truly important. Remembering that you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.


We who work to combat the diseases of old age that lead to decrepitude use the same realization to spur us forward in the fight to save lives.  Is there any other rational course of action?

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

Running your own Structure analysis

Thanks to the European Genetics and Anthropology Blog for this DIY Genetics experiment:

If you bought a genome-wide scan at 23andme and/or deCODEme, then you have access to your raw data, which gives you the option of going beyond the bio-geographic analyses offered by these companies. For example, you can use various programs to compare yourself to publicly available samples from around the world. Structure is one of the more popular tools for this sort of thing, so here's a guide how to set up a quick analysis using Structure and a data sheet from Kosoy et al. 2009:

- Download the 2.3.2 Beta version of Structure, with the graphical front end, which makes things a lot easier.

- Extract the following 125 SNPs from your raw data. Actually, 128 are listed on that sheet, but only 125 currently available at 23andme, although that's not a problem.

- Convert the genotypes to integers, as per the instruction sheet above. For example, if you're AG for rs731257, then convert that to 12 (ie. A=1, G=2). The three missing SNPs, as well as any no-calls, should be listed as 55.

- Download the sample data sheet, and add yourself to it. Make sure you look exactly like all the other samples on there, so you'll need to add the various tags that precede the genotypes. For example, instead of "EURA CEU CEPH1334.10 1", try something like "EURA POL Myself 1", or if you're African American then maybe "AFR AME Myself 2".

- Start Structure and load up the data sheet by going to "File" and then "New Project". Fill in the necessary fields in the Project Wizard, such as: Number of individuals 639; Ploidy of data 1; Number of loci 128; Missing data value 55. Then tick the following boxes: "Row of marker names", "Data file stores data for individuals in a single line", "Individual ID for each individual", "Putative population origin for each individual", "USEOFPOPINFO selection flag", and finally "Sampling location information".

- Define the parameter set (ie. go to "Parameter Set" and then "New"). The length of burn-in period should be at least 10,000 and the number of MCM reps about 50,000. Of course, to save time you can reduce both, especially if you're not too worried about a bit of noise. On the other hand, if you want to minimize noise as much as possible, then go up to something like 100,000 burn-ins and 500,000 reps. But be warned, runs like this can take days.

- Press the "!" button, specify the number of clusters (K) you'd like to divide the samples into, and click "OK". Alternatively, you can let the program work its way from K2 to whatever; Project > Start a Job > pick the parameter set > specify the K range (for example, from K2 to K6) > press the "Start" button.


Here are my results at K4. Obviously, if you're of overwhelmingly European origin, it's unlikely you'll get anything below 99% European/West Eurasian with these 125 markers. Much larger sets of SNPs are needed to get more detailed admixture estimates, and to break down the intra-West Eurasian and intra-European components.


Indeed, if you're good with Excel and Access then it's even possible to go up to something like 500,000 SNPs. HapMap and HGDP samples are available online, although the latter are presented in a somewhat different way than the 23andme raw data, which is a real pain because it takes a lot of work to overcome. Also, there are other settings you can try to see how they affect the results, like turning on LOCPRIOR, which tells Structure the putative origins of the samples. You can use different data formats too, examples of which are shown on the Structure home page.

Roman Kosoy et al., Ancestry informative marker sets for determining continental origin and admixture proportions in common populations in America, Human Mutation 2009,
Volume 30 Issue 1, Pages 69 - 78, doi: 10.1002/humu.20822

Hubisz M. J., Falush D., Stephens M., Pritchard J. K., Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information, Molecular Ecology Resources 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02591.x
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2009/11/running-your-own-structure-analysis.html

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

Selenium supplements linked to high cholesterol

By Guy Montague-Jones, 17-Nov-2009

Related topics: Research, Minerals, Cardiovascular health

Taking selenium supplements may increase cholesterol levels by as much as 10 per cent, according to a new study.

Writing in the Journal of Nutrition, scientists at the University of Warwick Medical School said consuming too much selenium can have adverse effects.

Selenium is considered a health ingredient because of its antioxidant properties, and the perception that it can reduce cancer risks. The body naturally absorbs selenium from vegetables, meat, and seafood but it is also found in higher quantities in supplements.

Health benefits may be linked to selenium but according to a team led by Dr Saverio Stranges at Warwick University, the balance can be tipped and high levels of selenium in the diet are associated with increased cholesterol.

The link

The scientists reached this conclusion after examining the relationship between plasma selenium concentrations (levels of selenium in the blood) with blood lipids (fats in the blood).

A cross-sectional study of the 1042 participants in the 2000-2001 National Diet and Nutrition Survey revealed that among those with higher plasma selenium (more than 1.20 µmol/L) there was an increase in the average total cholesterol level of 8 per cent (0.39 mmol/L (i.e. 15.1 mg/dL).

Researchers also found a 10 per cent increase in non-HDL cholesterol levels, which is the bad cholesterol most closely linked to heart disease.

Making the final step linking high selenium intake, supplementation, and high cholesterol, the scientists noted that among the participants, 48.2 per cent admitted they regularly took dietary supplements.

Supplement warning

Dr Saverio Stranges said high levels of selenium were not exclusively caused by supplementation, but the conclusions of the study do raise concerns given the increased use of selenium supplements in recent years.

Stranges said: “The cholesterol increases we have identified may have important implications for public health. In fact, such a difference could translate into a large number of premature deaths from coronary heart disease.

“We believe that the widespread use of selenium supplements, or of any other strategy that artificially increases selenium status above the level required, is unwarranted at the present time.” Stranges called for further research to examine the full range of health effects from increased selenium in the diet.

In a recent opinion on selenium, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that it could offer “protection of DNA, proteins and lipids from oxidative damage, normal function of the immune system, normal thyroid function and normal spermatogenesis.” But the EFSA Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) dismissed claims linking the mineral to normal cognitive function, normal prostate function and normal function of the heart and blood vessels

Source: Journal of Nutrition

November 11, 2009 doi:10.3945/jn.109.111252

“Higher Selenium Status is Associated with Adverse Blood Lipid Profile in British Adults

Authors: S. Stranges, M. Laclaustra, C Ji, F.P. Cappuccio, A. Navas-Acien, J.M. Ordovas, M. Rayman, E. Guallar


http://www.nutraingredients.com/Research/Selenium-supplements-linked-to-high-cholesterol/?c=0dQornGJR3qf6dGwol2Fng%3D%3D&utm_source=Newsletter_Subject&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2BSubject

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [1]

Milk may boost iron uptake from fruit juices

By Stephen Daniells, 10-Nov-2009

Related topics: Research, Minerals

Formulating iron-enriched fruit juices with milk may improve uptake of the mineral, suggests new research that offers a way of boosting iron intake for people at risk of deficiency.

Spanish researchers report that milk may increase iron uptake from iron-fortified fruit juices by up to four times, and exceeded uptakes observed when juices were formulated with casein proteins, according to findings published in the Food Chemistry.

“The addition of milk to fruit beverages exerted a positive effect on iron retention, transport and uptake versus fruit beverages, and this effect was greater than in the case of caseinophosphopeptides added to soluble fractions of fruit beverages,” wrote the researchers, led by Reyes Barbera from the University of Valencia.

“The addition of caseinophosphopeptides to soluble fractions f fruit beverages improved iron transport,” they added.

Iron deficiency remains the leading nutrient deficiency in both developed as well as developing countries. It affects around one in five women in the UK.

Fortifying foods with iron also poses several challenges for the food industry, most notably with regards to effects on colour, taste, and the shelf-life of the food.

However, the researchers stressed that additional studies are needed to confirm the results, especially in humans. It should also be clarified which caseinophosphopeptides favour iron bioavailability, they said.

“In addition, studies are required on the addition of functional ingredients to fruit beverages with the purpose of favouring iron bioavailability,” wrote Barbera and co-workers.

Study details

Using different fruit juice concentrates, including grape concentrate, orange concentrate, and apricot puree, the researchers prepared fruit juices enriched with iron sulphate at a level of 3 milligrams of 100 ml fruit beverage, with or without skimmed milk.

A comparison was made with juices formulated with caseinophosphopeptides, and measurements of iron retention, transport and uptake Caco- 2 cells.

The study showed that milk improved the retention, transport and uptake of iron in the fruit juices, even more than when CPPs were added to soluble fractions of fruit beverages.

“Iron supplementation increased iron retention, transport and uptake – the effect being more notable in samples with milk,” noted Barbera and co-workers.

Source: Food Chemistry
Volume 119, Issue 1, Pages 141-148
“Addition of milk or caseinophosphopeptides to fruit beverages to improve iron bioavailability?”
Authors: M.J. Garcia-Nebot, A. Alegria, R. Barbera, G. Clemente, F. Romero


http://www.nutraingredients.com/Research/Milk-may-boost-iron-uptake-from-fruit-juices/?c=0dQornGJR3q46in86HBIPg%3D%3D&utm_source=Newsletter_Subject&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2BSubject

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

Nano curcumin could boost spice’s health benefits

By Stephen Daniells, 09-Nov-2009

Related topics: Research, Antioxidants, carotenoids, Phytochemicals, plant extracts, Cancer risk reduction, Cardiovascular health, Cognitive and mental function

Nano-sized curcumin capsules may boost the body’s uptake of the ingredient, and enhance its potential to prevent colon cancer and Alzheimer’s disease, suggests a new study from Japan.

Using liposomes, little microcapsules made from phospholipids, can encapsulate curcumin and lead to a quadrupling in the compound’s absorption, according to findings published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

“These liposomal formulations can enable enhanced curcumin food functionalization,” wrote the researchers, led by Dr Koji Wada from the University of the Ryukyus.

Curcumin is a natural pigment that gives the spice turmeric its yellow colour. Recent studies have investigated its potential to lower cholesterol levels, improve cardiovascular health, reduce the risk of Alzheimer's and diabetes as well as cancer-fighting properties.

Despite the potential health benefits of curcumin, Wada and co-workers say that digestive juice in the gastrointestinal tract quickly destroys most curcumin, leading to only a little actually getting into the blood.

The new study used commercially available lecithins to prepare liposomes for the encapsulation of curcumin. Using 2.5 per cent curcumin, the researchers obtained an encapsulation efficiency of 68 per cent, with average particle sizes of abour 263 nanometres.

The formulations were then fed to Sprague-Dawley rats at a curcumin dose of 100 milligrams for every kilogram of rat body weight.

Results showed that the nano-encapsulated curcumin led to blood levels up to 320 micrograms per litre, compared to 65 micrograms per litre for non-encapsulated curcumin.

“These results indicated that curcumin enhanced the gastrointestinal absorption by liposomes encapsulation,” said the researchers.

This enhancement could be due to the particle size, they said, with other studies showing that liposomes of around 200 nanometres are efficienty taken up in the intestine, and therefore avoid metabolism in the liver.

Incorporation in liposomes may also lead to the curcumin being included in phospholipid membranes in the body

“Encapsulation also allows for prolonged contact with the intestinal wall due to the adhesive property that liposomes exhibit toward the epithelial mucosal surface of the small intestine,” wrote Wada and his co-workers. “Accordingly, it seems that encapsulation of curcumin is highly advantageous for optimizing food functionality,” they added.

An increase in plasma antioxidant activity was also observed following ingestion of the curcumin liposomes, with activity three-fold that of the non-encapsulated curcumin-fed animals.

“The available information strongly suggests that liposome encapsulation of ingredients such as curcumin may be used as a novel nutrient delivery system,” concluded the researchers.

Source: Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Volume 57, Pages 9141–9146, doi:10.1021/jf9013923
"Evaluation of an Oral Carrier System in Rats: Bioavailability and Antioxidant Properties of Liposome-Encapsulated Curcumin"
Authors: M. Takahashi, S. Uechi, K. Takara, Y. Asikin, K. Wada


http://www.nutraingredients.com/Research/Nano-curcumin-could-boost-spice-s-health-benefits/?c=0dQornGJR3r%2FT4mfAXAtFA%3D%3D&utm_source=Newsletter_Subject&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Newsletter%2BSubject

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]

DNA EXTRACTION AND GEL ELECTROPHORESIS EXPERIMENTS USING EVERYDAY MATERIALS

THE MACGYVER PROJECT: GENOMIC DNA EXTRACTION AND GEL ELECTROPHORESIS EXPERIMENTS USING EVERYDAY MATERIALS

By Yas Shirazu, Donna Lee, and Esther Abd-Elmessih

Abstract:
DNA extraction and separation by agarose gel electrophoresis is a simple and exciting process that anyone can perform. However, the high cost of specialized equipment and chemicals often hinder such an experiment from being carried by members of the high school community. Here, we describe a cost effective way of extracting and electrophoresing DNA under a prescribed MacGyver limitation – that is using only materials available from a grocery store or shopping mall.
* * *

In order to carry out this project, we decided to first divide the procedure into three specific sections, each to be addressed individually. Doing this, you find that the following challenges are present. They are: (i) extraction of DNA, (ii) gel electrophoresis of DNA and (iii) visualization of DNA.

Extraction of DNA in a Research Setting:
In a conventional research setting, the first step in extracting DNA involves breaking open the cell’s membrane by using physical or chemical means. Examples include the use of sonication (sonic waves), homogenization equipment (blender, french press, mortar and pestle) or selective detergent use. To us, exploration of detergents (or soaps) or physical steps (mortar and pestle) were the most obvious choices.

Once the cell/tissue has been lysed, usually subsequent steps involve an attempt to purify or enrich the sample for your DNA (i.e. get rid of the other stuff). This can be done in a number of ways, many of which are not technically feasible under our MacGyver rubric. However, a cell lysate can be easily enriched for DNA using alcohol to selectively precipitate DNA, forming it to clump into a “snot” like entity. Consequently, we have decided to focus on the extraction of genomic DNA since this type of sample works best under the alcohol precipation protocol and is also the most abundant DNA species for ease of visualization at both the extraction and gel steps.

A genomic prep is also interesting from an educational point of view. A teacher could pose ‘why do people want to obtain genomic DNA?’ – a question which can lead to numerous discussions pertaining to the cloning of new genes, organisms (Dolly the Sheep); having a source of DNA for fingerprinting purposes (CSI, forensics), or even the preparation of a sample for the sequencing of the organism’s entire genome (Human Genome Project). Focusing on genomic DNA also allows a student to explore samples from different sources, where there is a reasonable possibility that the differences in genome size can be discerned. As a bonus, the precipitation of DNA into a ‘snot’ like form adds an added ‘wow’ factor to the activity.

MacGyver Extraction of DNA:
Reagents and materials for this portion of the experiment are fairly straightforward. Here, one needs to find a tissue source, some manner of physical breaking, clean water/buffer solution, a soap, and an alcohol. In addition, some type of container to do this in will be required, preferably one that is transparent in nature.

Tissue Source:
Although the chemical characteristics of the DNA isolated is practically identical from organism to organism, the cell in which it is housed can vary greatly. Consequently, choice of tissue is the largest variable, but arguably the best element for a student to play around with. We have tried extracting DNA from onion, split peas, corn, yeast, bean sprouts, wheat germ, kiwi, banana and even human cheek cells, all with varying degrees of success. We find that overall, good DNA can be achieved with any fresh produce or grain material, as long as the experimenter is willing to play around to find optimal conditions. Overall, however, we recommend onion or banana tissue as the best sources of low maintenance DNA extraction. We also recommend wheat germ, in that a “fast” procedure exists that works very well. Finally, DNA isolated from a student’s own cheek cells is an interesting alternative, since it brings in a personal element to the activity. However, it should be noted that isolation from cheek cells is less reliable.

Physical Step:
Depending on the tissue you use, a physical step may be warranted. This could be as involved as cutting up the tissue and then using a mortar and pestle, or as minor as banging around with a wooden chopstick. In general, plant material and meat cuts would benefit from such a step, since plants have a tough cell wall to contend with, and meat usually contains tough muscle striations.

Buffer Solution:
This is the fluid that the sample needs to be immersed in, and as such has the role of simply keeping your DNA safe. There are many possible MacGyver type buffers that one can use for the extraction procedure, which all basically work (see Table 1). We should note, however, that distilled or bottled water should be used. Tap water appears to have a minor effect on the extraction procedure, and is actually very detrimental in the subsequent gel steps described later.


TABLE 1: BUFFER RECIPES*

A: “Saline Buffer”
0.9% saline (contact lens solution)

B: “Regular Buffer”
1.5g table salt (NaCl)
5.0g baking soda (sodium bicarbonate)
to a final volume of 120ml with water

C: “Acidic Buffer”
1.5g table salt (NaCl)
5.0g baking soda (sodium bicarbonate)
5mL of vinegar
to a final volume of 120ml with water

D: “Proteinase Buffer”
1.5g table salt
5.0g baking soda
2.5mL Complete eye solution or 2 protein tablets (Complete brand)
to a final volume of 120ml with water

E: “Meat Tenderizer Buffer”
100mL hot water
3g meat tenderizer

*Note that water alone can also be used effectively.


Soap/Detergent:
Liquid dish washing soap was generally used. In terms of specifics, we found better results when the soap was colourless, and found that unscented versions may work best overall. Essentially, most soaps available at grocery stores have additives that play roles in preservation, scent, colour, stain removal etc, etc. Although these things are usually not an issue with the technique, choosing the simplest soap is a good thing to troubleshoot with if you are not having success with your extraction. In general, we found that using about 5ml (or less) of detergent per 120ml solution works well.

Filtering:
Depending on your tissue choice and also the amount of tissue you have decided to use, it may be pertinent to include a filtering step to remove the debris. This allows a better visualization of the DNA snot effect at the end. Filtering can be easily accomplished using coffee filters, or cheese cloth. Note that when using cheese cloth, you will need use 3-4 layers of cheesecloth. Coffee filters are generally easier because they are cheaper, more accessible, and easier to cleanup.

Precipitation with Alcohol:
Precipitation of DNA is done by contact with alcohol. This alcohol is available at pharmacies as rubbing alcohol of the 99% iso-propanol variety. Alternatively, most schools will have access to 95% ethanol stocks. The alcohol should be added in a layering manner so that one can see the DNA forming at the interface between your sample and the alcohol. You should add at least two times the volume of your original sample. If you do not see “snot” forming, then mixing everything together should get the desired effect. Note that if you intend to resort to mixing, then the filtering step may be especially necessary for ease of visualization.

DNA precipitates under alcohol treatment because it is naturally hydrophobic and as such will tend to clump together if the solvent is not optimal (i.e. water). As a result, adding an alcohol to your prep will mean that DNA is not completely solvated in its optimal environment (water), and will therefore aggregate, and precipitate out of solution. It should be stressed that the degree and ease of clumping will depend on the amount of DNA present, and also the concentration at which it exists. Therefore, if you see minimal amounts of DNA, you should be able to correct this by (i) trying to isolate from more tissue, and (ii) resuspend the material in a smaller volume of fluid.


TABLE 2: SUGGESTED MACGYVER GENOMIC DNA EXTRACTION PROTOCOLS:

GENERAL PROTOCOL
1. If necessary, slice up DNA source of choice. Use an amount about the size of a strawberry.
2. Using a mortar and pestle, grind up sample while gradually adding 10mL of prepared buffer solution with the detergent already added. Grind for at least 5 minutes with all of your weight and strength to ensure that you break open the cell membrane and reach a creamy soup consistency. If the sample is too thick after grinding, add more saline solution to achieve the optimal thickness so that the liquid portion of the sample is able to pass through the filter, while the larger cellular material remains behind on the filter. Note: If the DNA sample is frozen, it is considerably easier to grind.
3. Filter your sample’s juice into a small beaker. Let the solution drip into the beaker until all of the liquid has passed through the filter. If this takes too long, simply squeeze all of the juice from the sample through the filter.
4. Add 2 volumes (this means approximately two times the volume of the sample present) of ice cold alcohol down the side of the beaker with a straw or pasteur pipette. Do this step slowly to enable the alcohol to form a layer on top of the juice layer. As you let the beaker sit, the DNA should precipitate. The longer you wait, the more DNA you should see. If you don’t see precipitation, gently mix everything together.
5. The DNA precipitates should resemble a thread of translucent white snot,at the interface between the juice and alcohol. After a considerable amount of time, the DNA may eventually float to the top of the alcohol layer.
6. You can remove the DNA with a wooden popsicle stick or glass rod. DNA adheres well to the wood.

QUICK PROTOCOL
1. Place a teaspoon or less of wheat germ in your cup.
2. Add about 10ml distilled water and crush gently with a popsicle stick/chopstick for 1 minute.
3. Then add a squirt of dish detergent and crush gently with popsicle stick for 2 minutes.
4. Slowly pour alcohol down the length of the stir stick, layering the alcohol on top of the water.
5. Set the container down on a table and look for the DNA at the interface between the alcohol and water.

CHEEK CELL PROTOCOL
1. Measure 10 ml of “regular buffer (from Table 1), pour buffer in mouth and swirl around cheeks for about 1 minute.
2. Spit the water back into a container, preferably something relatively narrow like a test tube.
3. Squirt a bit of liquid soap to the sample and mix well with popsicle stick. If you can mix by inversion, then do so gently about 20 times.
4. Add 10 ml cold alcohol slowly to the sample and make sure to pour it at an angle down the side of the test tube so that two layers are formed. Do this very gently, with a straw, etc. It’s important that the two layers are not disturbed.
5. Wait for about 10 minutes and the DNA will appear afloat on the alcohol layer.


Gel Electrophoresis of DNA in a Research Setting:
Electrophoresis is a way of separating molecules based on charge and size. In our case, we want to separate different sizes of genomic DNA molecules obtained from fruits, vegetables and yeast. Generally, polysaccharide polymers such as agarose or acrylamide are used to form the electrophoresis gels. Because DNA is negatively charged, one can force it to travel through the gel by applying an electric field in the system. Normally, this is achieved by using special gel apparatus designed to facilitate the production or casting of the “gel” as well as allow a platform to immerse the gel in an ion containing buffer to create an electric field. Such an apparatus will run a minimum of about $500, and power packs normally used to deliver ~80V of voltage can run in a similar price range. Consequently, this aspect of the MacGyver project is arguably focused on cost savings and concentrates primarily on finding a substitute for agarose and directions for producing a gel apparatus.

MacGyver Gel Electrophoresis of DNA:
Gel Material:
Agarose is a component of seaweed and as such is a refined purified molecule derived from a common food thickener known as “Agar Agar.” which incidentally can be easily found at most oriental style food stores. “Agar Agar” can be purchased in either a flake, noodle or powder form. Try to ensure that it does not contain any additional ingredients (such as glucose) as these ingredients may interfere with the formation of the gel matrix. To make the gel, it is recommended to use “Agar Agar” in the powder form rather than the flake or noodle form. The other larger forms tend to require cutting and additional filtering which is problematic and very messy.

Running Buffer:
You will need to prepare a running buffer which is required to make the gel, and also required as the fluid that will ultimately immerse your solidified gel to allow the electric field to be conducted. The Macgyver running buffer recipe is as follows:

- 0.05g of NaCl (this is the principle ion)
- 2g of Baking Soda (Sodium Bicarbonate)
- bring to 1L with distilled bottle water

pH’d using pet store aquarium pH kit to approximately pH7.5. (we used alkaline buffer made by Seqchem).

Gel Apparatus:
Although a research grade gel box is costly, it is in fact a relatively simple piece of equipment. In essence it is a large container (let’s call it a buffer chamber) that can hold fluid, whereby opposite ends are connected to a power source setting up a positive/negative electrode scenario. The buffer chamber needs to be able to conveniently hold a smaller container (let’s call this the gel casting chamber) that is used to make and hold the gel. Furthermore, the smaller gel casting chamber needs to fit in such a manner as to be in the middle between the two electrodes of the buffer chamber.

Assembling this electrophoresis box should be quite straightforward and even enjoyable for those that like to “make things.” We have included here a cartoon guide (Figure 1) for making these two chambers out of common plasticware (tupperware, soap dish, etc). For the electrode connections, we were limited to stainless steel screws (5cm) and stainless steel wire (20 gauge), which worked fine. However, a more elaborate electrode system would be easy to make with a visit to a proper hardware store.

As an alternative to using tupperware, we have also found Lego to be extremely useful in custom making a buffer chamber to fit your gel casting chamber. Note that Lego chambers will need to be lined with a water tight material, but recently Glad has developed a new “Glad Press’N Seal” material which works perfectly and is easy to handle.

Finally, a “comb: will need to be made. This is a contraption that allows small wells to be formed in your gel. Here, we found lego to be especially useful, but in a bind, we also made combs by cutting out pieces of plastic, or taping the teeth of a real hair comb.


FIGURE 1: MACGYVER GEL BOX CONSTRUCTION NOTES.


Gel Preparation:
Using the powdered “Agar Agar” you will want to make a 1.2% to 1.5% gel (w/v or 1.2g to 1.5g per 100ml of running buffer). In a separate container, (a flask for instance) weigh out the required amount of “Agar Agar” and add the required amount of running buffer (specific amounts will be dictated by the size of your gel casting set-up). The flask should be large enough so that the “Agar Agar” solution forms a 2 cm layer at the base. This is required to ensure a large surface area in contact with the hotplate for effective melting. It is recommended to use a hot plate and continued stirring to heat the agar solution evenly. An alternative is to use a microwave, but with this method one must use a low heat level at short intervals while swirling the mixture frequently. If this procedure is not carried out carefully, the solution will likely overboil and create a large mess. Note that if the “Agar Agar” solution is not completely dissolved, this will greatly affect the mobility of the DNA as it travels through the gel. Furthermore, undissolved bits of agar will be stained during the staining procedure, making it difficult to view the bands of DNA.

Note: some schools have access to the “Agar” used to make bacterial plates. This material works very well in pouring gels (much better than “Agar Agar”) We recommend making a 1% w/v gel for genomic visualization purposes.

Make sure that you have sealed the open ends of your casting gel chamber with masking tape or similar material. Pour the melted mixture into your casting gel chamber. Remember to also insert the “comb” so that well formation can occur. It will take approximately 20 to 30 minutes at room temperature for the gel to solidify. During this time do not disturb the gel. The gel is quite delicate, so be very careful when you remove the comb before loading your sample

The gel should be poured to about a 0.5cm to 1.0cm thickness. Thicker gels allow the opportunity to make deeper wells, thereby allowing a larger sample to be loaded. Thinner gels should run faster. Note that if the gel is too thin, it may float when immersed. Try to use the gel as soon as possible. Although you can wrap it in plastic wrap and store it in the fridge overnight, they will work better when used fresh.

DNA Sample Preparation:
Your genomic snot DNA can be removed at the end of the extraction procedure using a wooden stir stick. The DNA should then be dipped in a 70% alcohol solution which facilitates removal of excess salts. This is very important for effective dissolving as well as effective gel running. The DNA can then be air dried for approximately 10 minutes to evaporate residual alcohol, and then dislodged into a small volume of running buffer (the smaller the better, i.e. <0.5mls). One should note that genomic DNA can often take days to dissolve properly. We suggest allowing the DNA to dissolve overnight at room temperature (if you have access to temperature up to 50C, then that is best). Be gentle to your sample as the large genomic DNA is very prone to shearing. Once the overnight dissolving step is finished, consider this your DNA sample regardless of whether it has dissolved to completion.

Your sample will then need to be treated with a loading buffer. This is essentially something that will cause your sample to be viscous so that it can indeed “sink” into your wells during loading. Often, a loading buffer also has a dye, which will travel in the same direction as the DNA, and also makes the gel loading easier to see.

Our recipe is as follows:
- 0.5ml glycerol/glycerine (available at the pharmacy section)
- 0.1ml distilled water
- several drops of Club House Red Food Colouring (note that choice of dye can affect outcome greatly – we didn’t have a lot of success finding something good here, so a last resort would be to use without a dye).

This loading buffer can be used as 5X to 10X meaning that for 0.5ml of sample, you would need to add 0.05 to 0.1ml of loading buffer. Mix carefully. Your sample is now ready for the gel.

Gel Running.
Place your solidified gel (in gel casting chamber) within the larger buffer chamber. Add running buffer until the gel is immersed such that there is at least 3mm of fluid above the gel. Keep in mind that the more fluid you add, the slower the gel will run.
To your wells, load as much sample (with loading buffer) as possible. This is probably best done with a plastic stir stick attached to some type of rubber bulb. Essentially you would like to assemble something that can deliver fluid through a small tube. Once all the samples have been loaded, you will want to connect the electrodes to a series of 9V batteries. Your DNA is negatively charged so you want to position the positive electrode at the end “away” from the wells. Basically, one battery will suffice but will be very very slow (overnight run scenario). 5 to 7 or them lined up in a series circuit should deliver a good amount of voltage. Note that when the gel is running, DO NOT stick your finger in the fluid. Depending on the number of batteries you use, as much as 100mAmps of current is delivered (enough to give you a small shock).

When the circuit is running, a good visual check is to see that bubbles are forming from the wire electrodes, and usually most visible at the positive end.

The optimal amount of time to run the gel is, frankly, something that is difficult to predict, as it depends on the size of your gel, the thickness of your gel, the amount of running buffer in the system, the amount of voltage applied, and even the wiring set-up used. Consequently, this is the one thing where you will definitely have to play around. However, with a 5 to 7 battery set-up, you will need at least a minimum of 1hour, and possibly more. In addition, if differentiating genomic preps is in order (i.e. different genome size), you may need to experiment further with run time to see this potential difference.

Visualizing DNA in a Research Setting:
Upon completion of electrophoresis, the location of the bands need to be visualized. A common way to detect the bands is to stain the gel with ethidium bromide, which fluoresces under ultraviolet light to view the DNA. Unfortunately, both ethidium bromide and ultraviolet light are hazardous (Ethidium is higly carcinogenic and UV light can burn a person’s eyes without proper safety measures) and are therefore, not ideal for use among high school students.

MacGyver Way to Visualize the DNA:
To visualize the DNA bands, the gel was stained in a Methylene Blue solution. Methylene Blue consists of the salt methylene blue chloride. In water, the salt disassociates into a positively charged methylene blue ion that is colored blue and a negatively charged chloride ion, which is colorless. This blue chromophore is then able to bind to the positively charged DNA in the gel. Methylene blue is a convenient stain to use in the lab because it is chemically safe, reusable, and detects the presence of more than 20ng DNA/band.

More importantly, methylene blue can conveniently be found at most pet stores. It is generally sold as an aquarium disinfectant at a 5% concentration. The best gel staining results were obtained immersing the finished gel in a 0.02% methylene blue (in distilled water) solution overnight at room temperature. Using this protocol, destaining excess the excess colour with distilled water incubations was not required. We found that higher concentration solutions tended to stain the gel too dark making it difficult to differentiate the background from the DNA bands. This was observed even after destaining with distilled water. Also, if the “Agar Agar” powder was not completely dissolved in the gel, the non-dissolved flakes were stained dark blue, preventing the formation of distinct, visible bands.


FIGURE 2: CORN GENOMIC DNA PREP MACGYVER STYLE.


Yes, it’s faint! But it’s there…

Conclusions:
Overall, we have described an effective outline of methods to perform some basic molecular biology techniques under the MacGyver limitation (Figure 2). We should stress however that doing this in your own classroom will inevitably require some working out of your own. This is due to a multitude of considerations such as “Do I have enough DNA?” “what is my gel set-up” “what type of specialized reagents do I have at my disposal to make things even more efficient?” etc. However, it is hoped that the information presented here will make your troubleshooting as smooth as possible. Good luck!

Sphere: Related Content

Divider

Yas, Donna and Esther are at various stages of their careers in medicine or pharmaceutical studies. For the record, they have never ever worked together as a singing group.


http://www.scq.ubc.ca/the-macgyver-project-genomic-dna-extraction-and-gel-electrophoresis-experiments-using-everyday-materials/

Posted by ride my bike 

Comments [0]